Changes affect community papers

0
10

By Kevin Slimp

Over the past 15 years or so, I’ve worked with newspapers of all sizes.

My clients have included some of the biggest news­papers as well as a few of the smallest papers in North America.

I would like to dedicate this column to my friends in the community newspaper world.

So much is going on in our business – and I receive so many messages asking me to write about my thoughts on these events – that I wanted to take one column to explain how I think some of the big “stories” about the newspaper industry particularly effect those of us at smaller papers.

Large metros cut daily delivery

The Newhouse folks, aka Advance Publications, continue to convert their daily newspapers to non-daily distribution.

I’ve lost count of the number of Advance papers that have made the move, starting with nine properties in Michigan, then moving through New Orleans, Alabama, Pennsyl­vania, New York and now, Cleveland.

In July, I took a trip – on my own dime – to meet with media, business and civic leaders in Kalamazoo, Mich., to hear how the loss of a daily paper had effected their community.

In a community meeting hosted by the Home Builders of Southwest Michigan, I listened as one attendee after another spoke up about the negative impact felt after The Kalamazoo Gazette made the move from daily to non-daily delivery.

On my way to the meeting, I stopped at a supermarket and purchased a copy of the Wednesday edition of the paper.

The 20-page edition contained one ad, quarter-page in size.

That’s not a misprint.

Other than a few classifieds and public notices, there was one ad in the entire newspaper, not including house ads.

There were at least two people in attendance at the community meeting who owned com­munity newspapers in the area.

One of these owned a healthy free newspaper, while the other owned a successful paid weekly paper.

Of particular interest to me was that both were disappointed with the changes at the Kalamazoo newspaper but were taking advantage of increased advertising revenues as a result of the changes.

Let’s face it: Advertisers still need to advertise, even if they’ve lost their daily paper.

Broadcast media representa­tives also were in attendance.

It was interesting to learn that their revenue had also increased significantly as a result, they felt, of the changes at the daily newspaper.

In addition, local civic and business leaders, as well as others, shared their concern for a community without a “serious” newspaper.

Bezos bets $250 million on Washington Post

I didn’t plan to write about the Post. But I’ve received a bunch of emails and messages asking me to share what I think about the purchase of The Washington Post by Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos.

In a nutshell, I’m optimistic and worried.

Like fellow newspaper investor Warren Buffett, Bezos is a huge name that brings instant attention to an industry that can use some positive public relations.

It’s concerning that someone with no significant background in newspapers will take control of one of the most recognized newspapers in the world.

At the same time, Aaron Kushner and Eric Spitz had no previous newspaper experience, yet they’ve made huge advances at The Orange County Register in California.

So my hope is that Bezos will follow the examples of Buffett, Kushner and Spitz and invest in ways to improve the newspaper in the long run, rather than seeing it as a cash cow to be dismantled for a quick return.

I’m optimistic that could happen.

At the same time, I’ve been around this business long enough to recognize that the most successful papers are those that are run by people in their communities.

The farther the leadership is from the community, the less successful the papers tend to be.

When newspapers get bought up by large corpor­ations with no historical tie to the industry, it’s obviously a concern that they are being purchased simply as a commodity, with no thought to the responsibilities that come with newspaper ownership.

Where do community newspapers fit?

There are several ways smaller papers can take advantage of the atmosphere created by unrest in larger papers.

First, I’m a firm believer that what hurts our metro papers hurts all of us.

We’re all better off if our large, visible newspapers, are healthy and growing.

It presents advertisers with a negative view of print advertising in general when our large brethren are making moves that cause the world to see newspapers as a “dying industry.”

But like the publishers I met in Michigan, community papers can benefit by aggres­sively seeking advertisers in these same areas.

The home builders group in Michigan hosted the meeting in Kalamazoo because they feel like they’ve lost their most precious method of advertising: daily newspapers.

While the drop in home delivery can be catastrophic in a metro paper, area community papers can pick up the slack.

It’s also the case that, in communities served by metro papers who have decreased home distribution, readers are looking for solid local news.

One of the themes I heard time and again in Kalamazoo was that the reinvented newspaper had cut their news staff to the point that there wasn’t much real news in it.

Community papers can provide the news that readers are looking for.

If I were to wish, I’d wish that other metro papers would invest and improve in ways that the folks in Orange County are finding profitable.

But in places where that is not the case, I would suggest that community newspapers can fill the advertising vacuum by using this opportunity to improve their presence and offer advertisers the resources they are searching for.

Kevin Slimp is director of the Institute of Newspaper Technology, based in Ten­nessee. His column appears occasionally in The Publisher.